LOVOT 2.0 vs Nano
GROOVE X vs JOZ — specs, price, and data-backed comparison.
KURZFAZIT
- Nano offers the longer runtime (65 min vs 45 min).
- LOVOT 2.0 offers the lighter build (4.3 kg vs 550 kg).
TECHNISCHE DATEN IM VERGLEICH
| LOVOT 2.0 | Nano | |
|---|---|---|
| Hersteller | GROOVE X | JOZ |
| Kategorie | Consumer-Robot | Agricultural-Robots |
| Preis: | ¥449,900 | Nicht angekündigt |
| Gewicht | 4.3 kg | 550 kg |
| Geschwindigkeit | — | 0.39 km/h |
| Akkulaufzeit | 45 min | 65 min |
| Konnektivität | Bluetooth, infrared, wireless/wired LAN (Nest), NFC, mobile data; smartphone app | J-Link wireless to charging station; JMS remote monitoring |
Kaufberater und Preise
HÄUFIG GESTELLTE FRAGEN
What is the difference between the LOVOT 2.0 and the Nano?
LOVOT 2.0 is made by GROOVE X, while Nano is made by JOZ. LOVOT 2.0 is a consumer-robot, while Nano is a agricultural-robots.
Which is cheaper, the LOVOT 2.0 or the Nano?
The LOVOT 2.0 is listed at ¥449,900; pricing for the Nano has not been publicly announced.
Which has the longer battery life, the LOVOT 2.0 or the Nano?
The Nano has the higher runtime at about 65 minutes, compared to about 45 minutes for the LOVOT 2.0.