MUKA Wall Plastering Robot vs NJ-165-3.0
Xiamen MUKA Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd. vs Comau — specs, price, and data-backed comparison.
MUKA Wall Plastering Robot
Xiamen MUKA Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd.
Not announced
NJ-165-3.0
Comau
Not announced
QUICK TAKE
- NJ-165-3.0 offers the higher payload (165 kg vs 30 kg).
- MUKA Wall Plastering Robot offers the longer reach (3.4 m vs 3 m).
- MUKA Wall Plastering Robot offers the lighter build (680 kg vs 1,240 kg).
SPECIFICATIONS COMPARED
| MUKA Wall Plastering Robot | NJ-165-3.0 | |
|---|---|---|
| Company | Xiamen MUKA Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd. | Comau |
| Category | Industrial-Robot | Industrial-Robot |
| Price: | Not announced | Not announced |
| Weight | 680 kg | 1,240 kg |
| Payload | 30 kg | 165 kg |
| Reach | 3.4 m | 3 m |
| Degrees of Freedom | — | 6 |
| Speed | 1.08 km/h | — |
Buying guides and prices
FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS
What is the difference between the MUKA Wall Plastering Robot and the NJ-165-3.0?
MUKA Wall Plastering Robot is made by Xiamen MUKA Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd., while NJ-165-3.0 is made by Comau. Both are industrial-robots, so the differences come down to price and specifications.
Which has the higher payload, the MUKA Wall Plastering Robot or the NJ-165-3.0?
The NJ-165-3.0 has the higher payload at 165 kg, compared to 30 kg for the MUKA Wall Plastering Robot.