FP 12 vs U800AR
AFORMIC vs Asseco CEIT — specs, price, and data-backed comparison.
QUICK TAKE
- FP 12 offers the higher payload (1,000 kg vs 800 kg).
- U800AR offers the faster top speed (7.92 km/h vs 6.48 km/h).
SPECIFICATIONS COMPARED
| FP 12 | U800AR | |
|---|---|---|
| Company | AFORMIC | Asseco CEIT |
| Category | Industrial-Robot | Industrial-Robot |
| Price: | Not announced | Not announced |
| Weight | 333 kg | — |
| Payload | 1,000 kg | 800 kg |
| Speed | 6.48 km/h | 7.92 km/h |
| Battery Life | Li-Ion 120 Ah, 48 V | — |
| Connectivity | Wireless link to QURSOR fleet manager | — |
| Software / AI | AFORMIC QURSOR fleet management | — |
Buying guides and prices
FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS
What is the difference between the FP 12 and the U800AR?
FP 12 is made by AFORMIC, while U800AR is made by Asseco CEIT. Both are industrial-robots, so the differences come down to price and specifications.
Which has the higher payload, the FP 12 or the U800AR?
The FP 12 has the higher payload at 1,000 kg, compared to 800 kg for the U800AR.
Which is faster, the FP 12 or the U800AR?
The U800AR has the higher top speed at 7.92 km/h, compared to 6.48 km/h for the FP 12.