cocobo vs SQ-2
SECOM vs SEQSENSE — specs, price, and data-backed comparison.
快速總結
- SQ-2 offers the longer runtime (360 min vs 180 min).
- SQ-2 offers the lighter build (65 kg vs 135 kg).
規格對比
| cocobo | SQ-2 | |
|---|---|---|
| 公司 | SECOM | SEQSENSE |
| 類別 | Mobile-Robots | Mobile-Robots |
| 價格: | 尚未公布 | 尚未公布 |
| 發布年份: | 2022 | — |
| 重量 | 135 kg | 65 kg |
| 速度 | 6 km/h | — |
| 續航時間 | 180 min | 360 min |
| 連線方式 | 5G, LTE, Wi-Fi | — |
| 軟體 / AI | AI detection; monitoring console PC; cloud integration (elevators, building systems) | — |
選購指南與價格
常見問題
What is the difference between the cocobo and the SQ-2?
cocobo is made by SECOM, while SQ-2 is made by SEQSENSE. Both are mobile-robotss, so the differences come down to price and specifications.
Which has the longer battery life, the cocobo or the SQ-2?
The SQ-2 has the higher runtime at about 360 minutes, compared to about 180 minutes for the cocobo.


