Bosch Rexroth ACTIVE Shuttle vs SMAR M3-C
Bosch Rexroth vs Polaris3D — specs, price, and data-backed comparison.
快速总结
- Bosch Rexroth ACTIVE Shuttle offers the higher payload (260 kg vs 50 kg).
- Bosch Rexroth ACTIVE Shuttle offers the lighter build (88 kg vs 400 kg).
规格对比
| Bosch Rexroth ACTIVE Shuttle | SMAR M3-C | |
|---|---|---|
| 公司 | Bosch Rexroth | Polaris3D |
| 类别 | Industrial-Robot | Industrial-Robot |
| 价格： | 未公布 | 未公布 |
| 重量 | 88 kg | 400 kg |
| 负载 | 260 kg | 50 kg |
| 速度 | 3.6 km/h | — |
| 续航时间 | Lithium-ion 51.8 V / 29 Ah / 1,502 Wh | 2.66 kWh |
| 连接方式 | WLAN; 10.1 inch touchscreen (1,280 x 800) | — |
| 软件 / AI | ACTIVE Shuttle Management System (AMS): order allocation, traffic management, live map, energy management; REST API, WebSocket and SocketIO in JSON | — |
选购指南与价格
常见问题
What is the difference between the Bosch Rexroth ACTIVE Shuttle and the SMAR M3-C?
Bosch Rexroth ACTIVE Shuttle is made by Bosch Rexroth, while SMAR M3-C is made by Polaris3D. Both are industrial-robots, so the differences come down to price and specifications.
Which has the higher payload, the Bosch Rexroth ACTIVE Shuttle or the SMAR M3-C?
The Bosch Rexroth ACTIVE Shuttle has the higher payload at 260 kg, compared to 50 kg for the SMAR M3-C.