FR 48 vs VTA30/50
AFORMIC vs i-Cow — specs, price, and data-backed comparison.
クイックまとめ
- VTA30/50 offers the higher payload (3,000 kg vs 1,600 kg).
- VTA30/50 offers the lighter build (900 kg vs 3,800 kg).
スペック比較
| FR 48 | VTA30/50 | |
|---|---|---|
| 企業 | AFORMIC | i-Cow |
| カテゴリー | Industrial-Robot | Industrial-Robot |
| 価格: | 未発表 | 未発表 |
| 重量 | 3,800 kg | 900 kg |
| 可搬重量 | 1,600 kg | 3,000 kg |
| 速度 | 5.4 km/h | 5.4 km/h |
| バッテリー駆動時間 | Li-Ion 460 Ah, 48 V | — |
| 接続性 | Wireless link to QURSOR fleet manager | Fleet scheduling system; VDA 5050 |
| ソフトウェア / AI | AFORMIC QURSOR fleet management | — |
購入ガイドと価格
よくある質問
What is the difference between the FR 48 and the VTA30/50?
FR 48 is made by AFORMIC, while VTA30/50 is made by i-Cow. Both are industrial-robots, so the differences come down to price and specifications.
Which has the higher payload, the FR 48 or the VTA30/50?
The VTA30/50 has the higher payload at 3,000 kg, compared to 1,600 kg for the FR 48.