CLINABO vs RcDC
Nippon Signal vs Amano — specs, price, and data-backed comparison.
クイックまとめ
- CLINABO offers the longer runtime (180 min vs 120 min).
- RcDC offers the lighter build (30 kg vs 220 kg).
スペック比較
| CLINABO | RcDC | |
|---|---|---|
| 企業 | Nippon Signal | Amano |
| カテゴリー | Cleaning-Robots | Cleaning-Robots |
| 価格: | 未発表 | 未発表 |
| 発売: | — | 2015 |
| 重量 | 220 kg | 30 kg |
| 速度 | — | 2.3 km/h |
| バッテリー駆動時間 | 180 min | 120 min |
| 充電時間 | — | About 4 hours |
| 接続性 | — | Wireless link to a tablet |
| ソフトウェア / AI | Automatic map and route generation | Tablet app for setting cleaning areas, editing obstacles and monitoring completed areas |
購入ガイドと価格
よくある質問
What is the difference between the CLINABO and the RcDC?
CLINABO is made by Nippon Signal, while RcDC is made by Amano. Both are cleaning-robotss, so the differences come down to price and specifications.
Which has the longer battery life, the CLINABO or the RcDC?
The CLINABO has the higher runtime at about 180 minutes, compared to about 120 minutes for the RcDC.