SILBOT vs TUG
ROBOCARE vs Aethon — specs, price, and data-backed comparison.
KURZFAZIT
- TUG offers the longer runtime (600 min vs 360 min).
TECHNISCHE DATEN IM VERGLEICH
| SILBOT | TUG | |
|---|---|---|
| Hersteller | ROBOCARE | Aethon |
| Kategorie | Medical-Robots | Delivery-Robots |
| Preis: | Nicht angekündigt | Nicht angekündigt |
| Gewicht | 25 kg | — |
| Traglast | — | 454 kg |
| Freiheitsgrade | 11 | — |
| Akkulaufzeit | 360 min | 600 min |
| Konnektivität | Wireless Ethernet, Gigabit Ethernet, 2x USB 3.0 | Wi-Fi or 900 MHz radio; remote link to Aethon command centre |
Kaufberater und Preise
HÄUFIG GESTELLTE FRAGEN
What is the difference between the SILBOT and the TUG?
SILBOT is made by ROBOCARE, while TUG is made by Aethon. SILBOT is a medical-robots, while TUG is a delivery-robots.
Which has the longer battery life, the SILBOT or the TUG?
The TUG has the higher runtime at about 600 minutes, compared to about 360 minutes for the SILBOT.