Nao vs Perseverance Rover
Aldebaran Robotics (SoftBank / United Robotics) vs NASA — specs, price, and data-backed comparison.
Nao
Aldebaran Robotics (SoftBank / United Robotics)
Nicht angekündigt
Perseverance Rover
NASA
Nicht angekündigt
TECHNISCHE DATEN IM VERGLEICH
| Nao | Perseverance Rover | |
|---|---|---|
| Hersteller | Aldebaran Robotics (SoftBank / United Robotics) | NASA |
| Kategorie | Ground | Ground |
| Preis: | Nicht angekündigt | Nicht angekündigt |
| Veröffentlicht: | — | 2021 |
| Gewicht | 4.5 kg | 1,025 kg |
| Freiheitsgrade | — | 5 |
| Geschwindigkeit | — | 0.15 km/h |
| Akkulaufzeit | ~1–2 hours | Indefinite (nuclear-powered MMRTG, ~110W output) |
| Ladezeit | ~2 hours | — |
| Konnektivität | Wi-Fi, Ethernet | UHF (~400 MHz) relay via Mars orbiters; X-band direct-to-Earth high-gain antenna; X-band low-gain antenna |
| Software / KI | NAOqi OS | VxWorks RTOS; autonomous navigation (AutoNav); terrain-relative navigation (TRN) |
HÄUFIG GESTELLTE FRAGEN
What is the difference between the Nao and the Perseverance Rover?
Nao is made by Aldebaran Robotics (SoftBank / United Robotics), while Perseverance Rover is made by NASA. Both are grounds, so the differences come down to price and specifications.