Magazino SOTO vs SMAR M2-C1H
Magazino vs Polaris3D — specs, price, and data-backed comparison.
KURZFAZIT
- Magazino SOTO offers the higher payload (240 kg vs 110 kg).
- SMAR M2-C1H offers the longer runtime (720 min vs 480 min).
- SMAR M2-C1H offers the lighter build (91 kg vs 695 kg).
TECHNISCHE DATEN IM VERGLEICH
| Magazino SOTO | SMAR M2-C1H | |
|---|---|---|
| Hersteller | Magazino | Polaris3D |
| Kategorie | Industrial-Robot | Industrial-Robot |
| Preis: | Nicht angekündigt | Nicht angekündigt |
| Gewicht | 695 kg | 91 kg |
| Traglast | 240 kg | 110 kg |
| Reichweite | 1.7 m | — |
| Geschwindigkeit | 1.5 km/h | — |
| Akkulaufzeit | 480 min | 720 min |
| Konnektivität | VDA 5050 or Magazino Fleet Manager REST to WMS; two touch displays and status LEDs | — |
| Software / KI | Magazino Fleet Manager VDA 5050 integration REST interface to WMS ERP and MES connected | — |
Kaufberater und Preise
HÄUFIG GESTELLTE FRAGEN
What is the difference between the Magazino SOTO and the SMAR M2-C1H?
Magazino SOTO is made by Magazino, while SMAR M2-C1H is made by Polaris3D. Both are industrial-robots, so the differences come down to price and specifications.
Which has the higher payload, the Magazino SOTO or the SMAR M2-C1H?
The Magazino SOTO has the higher payload at 240 kg, compared to 110 kg for the SMAR M2-C1H.
Which has the longer battery life, the Magazino SOTO or the SMAR M2-C1H?
The SMAR M2-C1H has the higher runtime at about 720 minutes, compared to about 480 minutes for the Magazino SOTO.