Magazino SOTO vs SMAR M2
Magazino vs Polaris3D — specs, price, and data-backed comparison.
KURZFAZIT
- Magazino SOTO offers the higher payload (240 kg vs 80 kg).
- SMAR M2 offers the longer runtime (720 min vs 480 min).
- SMAR M2 offers the lighter build (50 kg vs 695 kg).
TECHNISCHE DATEN IM VERGLEICH
| Magazino SOTO | SMAR M2 | |
|---|---|---|
| Hersteller | Magazino | Polaris3D |
| Kategorie | Industrial-Robot | Industrial-Robot |
| Preis: | Nicht angekündigt | Nicht angekündigt |
| Gewicht | 695 kg | 50 kg |
| Traglast | 240 kg | 80 kg |
| Reichweite | 1.7 m | — |
| Geschwindigkeit | 1.5 km/h | — |
| Akkulaufzeit | 480 min | 720 min |
| Konnektivität | VDA 5050 or Magazino Fleet Manager REST to WMS; two touch displays and status LEDs | — |
| Software / KI | Magazino Fleet Manager VDA 5050 integration REST interface to WMS ERP and MES connected | — |
Kaufberater und Preise
HÄUFIG GESTELLTE FRAGEN
What is the difference between the Magazino SOTO and the SMAR M2?
Magazino SOTO is made by Magazino, while SMAR M2 is made by Polaris3D. Both are industrial-robots, so the differences come down to price and specifications.
Which has the higher payload, the Magazino SOTO or the SMAR M2?
The Magazino SOTO has the higher payload at 240 kg, compared to 80 kg for the SMAR M2.
Which has the longer battery life, the Magazino SOTO or the SMAR M2?
The SMAR M2 has the higher runtime at about 720 minutes, compared to about 480 minutes for the Magazino SOTO.