Magazino SOTO vs MOBOT CubeRunner 2.5
Magazino vs WObit — specs, price, and data-backed comparison.
KURZFAZIT
- MOBOT CubeRunner 2.5 offers the higher payload (250 kg vs 240 kg).
- MOBOT CubeRunner 2.5 offers the faster top speed (2.99 km/h vs 1.5 km/h).
TECHNISCHE DATEN IM VERGLEICH
| Magazino SOTO | MOBOT CubeRunner 2.5 | |
|---|---|---|
| Hersteller | Magazino | WObit |
| Kategorie | Industrial-Robot | Industrial-Robot |
| Preis: | Nicht angekündigt | Nicht angekündigt |
| Gewicht | 695 kg | — |
| Traglast | 240 kg | 250 kg |
| Reichweite | 1.7 m | — |
| Geschwindigkeit | 1.5 km/h | 2.99 km/h |
| Akkulaufzeit | 480 min | 480 min |
| Konnektivität | VDA 5050 or Magazino Fleet Manager REST to WMS; two touch displays and status LEDs | 2.4 GHz Wi-Fi; MOBOT RoutePlanner |
| Software / KI | Magazino Fleet Manager VDA 5050 integration REST interface to WMS ERP and MES connected | — |
Kaufberater und Preise
HÄUFIG GESTELLTE FRAGEN
What is the difference between the Magazino SOTO and the MOBOT CubeRunner 2.5?
Magazino SOTO is made by Magazino, while MOBOT CubeRunner 2.5 is made by WObit. Both are industrial-robots, so the differences come down to price and specifications.
Which has the higher payload, the Magazino SOTO or the MOBOT CubeRunner 2.5?
The MOBOT CubeRunner 2.5 has the higher payload at 250 kg, compared to 240 kg for the Magazino SOTO.
Which is faster, the Magazino SOTO or the MOBOT CubeRunner 2.5?
The MOBOT CubeRunner 2.5 has the higher top speed at 2.99 km/h, compared to 1.5 km/h for the Magazino SOTO.