Magazino SOTO vs MOBOT AGV eRunner
Magazino vs WObit — specs, price, and data-backed comparison.
KURZFAZIT
- Magazino SOTO offers the higher payload (240 kg vs 100 kg).
- MOBOT AGV eRunner offers the faster top speed (2.99 km/h vs 1.5 km/h).
- MOBOT AGV eRunner offers the lighter build (60 kg vs 695 kg).
TECHNISCHE DATEN IM VERGLEICH
| Magazino SOTO | MOBOT AGV eRunner | |
|---|---|---|
| Hersteller | Magazino | WObit |
| Kategorie | Industrial-Robot | Industrial-Robot |
| Preis: | Nicht angekündigt | Nicht angekündigt |
| Gewicht | 695 kg | 60 kg |
| Traglast | 240 kg | 100 kg |
| Reichweite | 1.7 m | — |
| Geschwindigkeit | 1.5 km/h | 2.99 km/h |
| Akkulaufzeit | 480 min | 480 min |
| Konnektivität | VDA 5050 or Magazino Fleet Manager REST to WMS; two touch displays and status LEDs | 2.4 GHz Wi-Fi; MOBOT RoutePlanner |
| Software / KI | Magazino Fleet Manager VDA 5050 integration REST interface to WMS ERP and MES connected | — |
Kaufberater und Preise
HÄUFIG GESTELLTE FRAGEN
What is the difference between the Magazino SOTO and the MOBOT AGV eRunner?
Magazino SOTO is made by Magazino, while MOBOT AGV eRunner is made by WObit. Both are industrial-robots, so the differences come down to price and specifications.
Which has the higher payload, the Magazino SOTO or the MOBOT AGV eRunner?
The Magazino SOTO has the higher payload at 240 kg, compared to 100 kg for the MOBOT AGV eRunner.
Which is faster, the Magazino SOTO or the MOBOT AGV eRunner?
The MOBOT AGV eRunner has the higher top speed at 2.99 km/h, compared to 1.5 km/h for the Magazino SOTO.