LOVOT 2.0 vs TERO Pro
GROOVE X vs LUMISTAR — specs, price, and data-backed comparison.
KURZFAZIT
- TERO Pro is the more affordable option at $1,899, versus ¥449,900 for LOVOT 2.0.
- TERO Pro offers the longer runtime (240 min vs 45 min).
- LOVOT 2.0 offers the lighter build (4.3 kg vs 8.8 kg).
TECHNISCHE DATEN IM VERGLEICH
| LOVOT 2.0 | TERO Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Hersteller | GROOVE X | LUMISTAR |
| Kategorie | Consumer-Robot | Consumer-Robot |
| Preis: | ¥449,900 | $1,899 |
| Veröffentlicht: | — | 2026 |
| Gewicht | 4.3 kg | 8.8 kg |
| Akkulaufzeit | 45 min | 240 min |
| Konnektivität | Bluetooth, infrared, wireless/wired LAN (Nest), NFC, mobile data; smartphone app | App, Apple Watch (via paired iPhone), wristband, voice and gesture control |
| Software / KI | — | 5 AI modes (Rally, Rank Up, AI Match, Random, All Star Game), 34 preset drills, custom patterns, NTRP rating, sports report, OTA |
Kaufberater und Preise
HÄUFIG GESTELLTE FRAGEN
What is the difference between the LOVOT 2.0 and the TERO Pro?
LOVOT 2.0 is made by GROOVE X, while TERO Pro is made by LUMISTAR. Both are consumer-robots, so the differences come down to price and specifications.
Which is cheaper, the LOVOT 2.0 or the TERO Pro?
The TERO Pro is cheaper, listed at $1,899 compared to ¥449,900 for the LOVOT 2.0.
Which has the longer battery life, the LOVOT 2.0 or the TERO Pro?
The TERO Pro has the higher runtime at about 240 minutes, compared to about 45 minutes for the LOVOT 2.0.