RobotAIGeek

Gento Luna vs QiO O2

Tianji Gento vs QiO Robotics — specs, price, and data-backed comparison.

KURZFAZIT

  • Gento Luna offers the higher payload (5 kg vs 3 kg).
  • QiO O2 offers the longer runtime (480 min vs 360 min).
  • Gento Luna offers the more degrees of freedom (26 vs 7).

TECHNISCHE DATEN IM VERGLEICH

Gento LunaQiO O2
HerstellerTianji GentoQiO Robotics
KategorieHumanoidHumanoid
Preis:Nicht angekündigtNicht angekündigt
Gewicht144 kg—
Traglast5 kg3 kg
Reichweite615 mm—
Freiheitsgrade267
Geschwindigkeit5.4 km/h—
Akkulaufzeit360 min480 min
Ladezeit<=1.5 h—
Konnektivität1 kHz EtherCAT; Wi-Fi and Ethernet; arm-end RS485, CAN FD, EtherCAT, CAN, 24 V (3 A) and 48 V—
Software / KIROS 2 with complete SDK and secondary-development APIs; position control, impedance control, load auto-identification and force-position hybrid controlDual-brain (large-brain plus small-brain) long-term memory system; world model with vision-language-action in a dual-stream mixture-of-experts architecture; 30 Hz real-time inference with edge-cloud collaboration

HÄUFIG GESTELLTE FRAGEN

What is the difference between the Gento Luna and the QiO O2?

Gento Luna is made by Tianji Gento, while QiO O2 is made by QiO Robotics. Both are humanoids, so the differences come down to price and specifications.

Which has the higher payload, the Gento Luna or the QiO O2?

The Gento Luna has the higher payload at 5 kg, compared to 3 kg for the QiO O2.

Which has the longer battery life, the Gento Luna or the QiO O2?

The QiO O2 has the higher runtime at about 480 minutes, compared to about 360 minutes for the Gento Luna.