FL 2 vs Yale MC10-15 Robotic Counterbalanced Stacker
AFORMIC vs Hyster-Yale — specs, price, and data-backed comparison.
FL 2
AFORMIC
Nicht angekündigt
Yale MC10-15 Robotic Counterbalanced Stacker
Hyster-Yale
Nicht angekündigt
KURZFAZIT
- FL 2 offers the higher payload (1,500 kg vs 1,247 kg).
- Yale MC10-15 Robotic Counterbalanced Stacker offers the faster top speed (7.2 km/h vs 5.4 km/h).
TECHNISCHE DATEN IM VERGLEICH
| FL 2 | Yale MC10-15 Robotic Counterbalanced Stacker | |
|---|---|---|
| Hersteller | AFORMIC | Hyster-Yale |
| Kategorie | Industrial-Robot | Industrial-Robot |
| Preis: | Nicht angekündigt | Nicht angekündigt |
| Gewicht | 595 kg | — |
| Traglast | 1,500 kg | 1,247 kg |
| Geschwindigkeit | 5.4 km/h | 7.2 km/h |
| Akkulaufzeit | Li-Ion 120 Ah, 48 V | — |
| Konnektivität | Wireless link to QURSOR fleet manager | WMS integration (optional) |
| Software / KI | AFORMIC QURSOR fleet management | — |
Kaufberater und Preise
HÄUFIG GESTELLTE FRAGEN
What is the difference between the FL 2 and the Yale MC10-15 Robotic Counterbalanced Stacker?
FL 2 is made by AFORMIC, while Yale MC10-15 Robotic Counterbalanced Stacker is made by Hyster-Yale. Both are industrial-robots, so the differences come down to price and specifications.
Which has the higher payload, the FL 2 or the Yale MC10-15 Robotic Counterbalanced Stacker?
The FL 2 has the higher payload at 1,500 kg, compared to 1,247 kg for the Yale MC10-15 Robotic Counterbalanced Stacker.
Which is faster, the FL 2 or the Yale MC10-15 Robotic Counterbalanced Stacker?
The Yale MC10-15 Robotic Counterbalanced Stacker has the higher top speed at 7.2 km/h, compared to 5.4 km/h for the FL 2.