FIT-U PRO vs Well-Being HAL® – Single Joint Type
ULS Robotics vs Cyberdyne Inc. — specs, price, and data-backed comparison.
FIT-U PRO
ULS Robotics
Nicht angekündigt
Well-Being HAL® – Single Joint Type
Cyberdyne Inc.
Nicht angekündigt
KURZFAZIT
- FIT-U PRO offers the higher payload (20 kg vs 1.5 kg).
- FIT-U PRO offers the longer runtime (330 min vs 120 min).
- FIT-U PRO offers the more degrees of freedom (8 vs 1).
- Well-Being HAL® – Single Joint Type offers the lighter build (1.5 kg vs 3.9 kg).
TECHNISCHE DATEN IM VERGLEICH
| FIT-U PRO | Well-Being HAL® – Single Joint Type | |
|---|---|---|
| Hersteller | ULS Robotics | Cyberdyne Inc. |
| Kategorie | Exosuit | Exosuit |
| Preis: | Nicht angekündigt | Nicht angekündigt |
| Veröffentlicht: | — | 2019 |
| Gewicht | 3.9 kg | 1.5 kg |
| Traglast | 20 kg | 1.5 kg |
| Freiheitsgrade | 8 | 1 |
| Akkulaufzeit | 330 min | 120 min |
| Software / KI | Impedance control with adaptive intelligent motion control | — |
Kaufberater und Preise
HÄUFIG GESTELLTE FRAGEN
What is the difference between the FIT-U PRO and the Well-Being HAL® – Single Joint Type?
FIT-U PRO is made by ULS Robotics, while Well-Being HAL® – Single Joint Type is made by Cyberdyne Inc.. Both are exosuits, so the differences come down to price and specifications.
Which has the higher payload, the FIT-U PRO or the Well-Being HAL® – Single Joint Type?
The FIT-U PRO has the higher payload at 20 kg, compared to 1.5 kg for the Well-Being HAL® – Single Joint Type.
Which has the longer battery life, the FIT-U PRO or the Well-Being HAL® – Single Joint Type?
The FIT-U PRO has the higher runtime at about 330 minutes, compared to about 120 minutes for the Well-Being HAL® – Single Joint Type.