ErigoPro vs Well-Being HAL – Lower Limb Type HAL-FL05
Hocoma vs Cyberdyne Inc. — specs, price, and data-backed comparison.
ErigoPro
Hocoma
Nicht angekündigt
Well-Being HAL – Lower Limb Type HAL-FL05
Cyberdyne Inc.
Nicht angekündigt
KURZFAZIT
- ErigoPro offers the longer runtime (360 min vs 270 min).
- Well-Being HAL – Lower Limb Type HAL-FL05 offers the lighter build (3.1 kg vs 300 kg).
- Well-Being HAL – Lower Limb Type HAL-FL05 is the newer platform (2,020 vs 2,013).
TECHNISCHE DATEN IM VERGLEICH
| ErigoPro | Well-Being HAL – Lower Limb Type HAL-FL05 | |
|---|---|---|
| Hersteller | Hocoma | Cyberdyne Inc. |
| Kategorie | Exosuit | Exosuit |
| Preis: | Nicht angekündigt | Nicht angekündigt |
| Veröffentlicht: | 2013 | 2020 |
| Gewicht | 300 kg | 3.1 kg |
| Akkulaufzeit | 360 min | 270 min |
| Software / KI | Graphical user interface with synchronised FES control | — |
HÄUFIG GESTELLTE FRAGEN
What is the difference between the ErigoPro and the Well-Being HAL – Lower Limb Type HAL-FL05?
ErigoPro is made by Hocoma, while Well-Being HAL – Lower Limb Type HAL-FL05 is made by Cyberdyne Inc.. Both are exosuits, so the differences come down to price and specifications.
Which has the longer battery life, the ErigoPro or the Well-Being HAL – Lower Limb Type HAL-FL05?
The ErigoPro has the higher runtime at about 360 minutes, compared to about 270 minutes for the Well-Being HAL – Lower Limb Type HAL-FL05.