ErigoPro vs Well-Being HAL® – Lower Limb Type
Hocoma vs Cyberdyne Inc. — specs, price, and data-backed comparison.
KURZFAZIT
- ErigoPro offers the longer runtime (360 min vs 60 min).
- Well-Being HAL® – Lower Limb Type offers the lighter build (3.1 kg vs 300 kg).
- Well-Being HAL® – Lower Limb Type is the newer platform (2,020 vs 2,013).
TECHNISCHE DATEN IM VERGLEICH
| ErigoPro | Well-Being HAL® – Lower Limb Type | |
|---|---|---|
| Hersteller | Hocoma | Cyberdyne Inc. |
| Kategorie | Exosuit | Exosuit |
| Preis: | Nicht angekündigt | Nicht angekündigt |
| Veröffentlicht: | 2013 | 2020 |
| Gewicht | 300 kg | 3.1 kg |
| Freiheitsgrade | — | 4 |
| Akkulaufzeit | 360 min | 60 min |
| Software / KI | Graphical user interface with synchronised FES control | — |
HÄUFIG GESTELLTE FRAGEN
What is the difference between the ErigoPro and the Well-Being HAL® – Lower Limb Type?
ErigoPro is made by Hocoma, while Well-Being HAL® – Lower Limb Type is made by Cyberdyne Inc.. Both are exosuits, so the differences come down to price and specifications.
Which has the longer battery life, the ErigoPro or the Well-Being HAL® – Lower Limb Type?
The ErigoPro has the higher runtime at about 360 minutes, compared to about 60 minutes for the Well-Being HAL® – Lower Limb Type.