Bosch Rexroth ACTIVE Shuttle vs SMAR M2
Bosch Rexroth vs Polaris3D — specs, price, and data-backed comparison.
KURZFAZIT
- Bosch Rexroth ACTIVE Shuttle offers the higher payload (260 kg vs 80 kg).
- SMAR M2 offers the lighter build (50 kg vs 88 kg).
TECHNISCHE DATEN IM VERGLEICH
| Bosch Rexroth ACTIVE Shuttle | SMAR M2 | |
|---|---|---|
| Hersteller | Bosch Rexroth | Polaris3D |
| Kategorie | Industrial-Robot | Industrial-Robot |
| Preis: | Nicht angekündigt | Nicht angekündigt |
| Gewicht | 88 kg | 50 kg |
| Traglast | 260 kg | 80 kg |
| Geschwindigkeit | 3.6 km/h | — |
| Akkulaufzeit | Lithium-ion 51.8 V / 29 Ah / 1,502 Wh | 720 min |
| Konnektivität | WLAN; 10.1 inch touchscreen (1,280 x 800) | — |
| Software / KI | ACTIVE Shuttle Management System (AMS): order allocation, traffic management, live map, energy management; REST API, WebSocket and SocketIO in JSON | — |
Kaufberater und Preise
HÄUFIG GESTELLTE FRAGEN
What is the difference between the Bosch Rexroth ACTIVE Shuttle and the SMAR M2?
Bosch Rexroth ACTIVE Shuttle is made by Bosch Rexroth, while SMAR M2 is made by Polaris3D. Both are industrial-robots, so the differences come down to price and specifications.
Which has the higher payload, the Bosch Rexroth ACTIVE Shuttle or the SMAR M2?
The Bosch Rexroth ACTIVE Shuttle has the higher payload at 260 kg, compared to 80 kg for the SMAR M2.


