RobotAIGeek

Bosch Rexroth ACTIVE Shuttle vs FP 3

Bosch Rexroth vs AFORMIC — specs, price, and data-backed comparison.

KURZFAZIT

  • FP 3 offers the higher payload (300 kg vs 260 kg).
  • FP 3 offers the faster top speed (7.2 km/h vs 3.6 km/h).
  • Bosch Rexroth ACTIVE Shuttle offers the lighter build (88 kg vs 200 kg).

TECHNISCHE DATEN IM VERGLEICH

Bosch Rexroth ACTIVE ShuttleFP 3
HerstellerBosch RexrothAFORMIC
KategorieIndustrial-RobotIndustrial-Robot
Preis:Nicht angekündigtNicht angekündigt
Gewicht88 kg200 kg
Traglast260 kg300 kg
Geschwindigkeit3.6 km/h7.2 km/h
AkkulaufzeitLithium-ion 51.8 V / 29 Ah / 1,502 WhLi-Ion 51 Ah, 48 V
KonnektivitätWLAN; 10.1 inch touchscreen (1,280 x 800)Wireless link to QURSOR fleet manager
Software / KIACTIVE Shuttle Management System (AMS): order allocation, traffic management, live map, energy management; REST API, WebSocket and SocketIO in JSONAFORMIC QURSOR fleet management

Kaufberater und Preise

HÄUFIG GESTELLTE FRAGEN

What is the difference between the Bosch Rexroth ACTIVE Shuttle and the FP 3?

Bosch Rexroth ACTIVE Shuttle is made by Bosch Rexroth, while FP 3 is made by AFORMIC. Both are industrial-robots, so the differences come down to price and specifications.

Which has the higher payload, the Bosch Rexroth ACTIVE Shuttle or the FP 3?

The FP 3 has the higher payload at 300 kg, compared to 260 kg for the Bosch Rexroth ACTIVE Shuttle.

Which is faster, the Bosch Rexroth ACTIVE Shuttle or the FP 3?

The FP 3 has the higher top speed at 7.2 km/h, compared to 3.6 km/h for the Bosch Rexroth ACTIVE Shuttle.