aunav.NEXT vs Colossus
EM&E Group vs Shark Robotics — specs, price, and data-backed comparison.
KURZFAZIT
- Colossus offers the higher payload (500 kg vs 250 kg).
- aunav.NEXT offers the faster top speed (4 km/h vs 3.5 km/h).
- Colossus offers the longer runtime (720 min vs 300 min).
TECHNISCHE DATEN IM VERGLEICH
| aunav.NEXT | Colossus | |
|---|---|---|
| Hersteller | EM&E Group | Shark Robotics |
| Kategorie | Military | Military |
| Preis: | Nicht angekündigt | Nicht angekündigt |
| Veröffentlicht: | — | 2019 |
| Gewicht | — | 525 kg |
| Traglast | 250 kg | 500 kg |
| Reichweite | 2.07 m | — |
| Freiheitsgrade | 8 | — |
| Geschwindigkeit | 4 km/h | 3.5 km/h |
| Akkulaufzeit | 300 min | 720 min |
| Konnektivität | COFDM radio, Bluetooth, fibre optic | — |
Kaufberater und Preise
HÄUFIG GESTELLTE FRAGEN
What is the difference between the aunav.NEXT and the Colossus?
aunav.NEXT is made by EM&E Group, while Colossus is made by Shark Robotics. Both are militarys, so the differences come down to price and specifications.
Which has the higher payload, the aunav.NEXT or the Colossus?
The Colossus has the higher payload at 500 kg, compared to 250 kg for the aunav.NEXT.
Which is faster, the aunav.NEXT or the Colossus?
The aunav.NEXT has the higher top speed at 4 km/h, compared to 3.5 km/h for the Colossus.
Which has the longer battery life, the aunav.NEXT or the Colossus?
The Colossus has the higher runtime at about 720 minutes, compared to about 300 minutes for the aunav.NEXT.