AspinaAMR85L vs SMAR M2QD
ASPINA (Shinano Kenshi) vs Polaris3D — specs, price, and data-backed comparison.
KURZFAZIT
- AspinaAMR85L offers the higher payload (85 kg vs 80 kg).
- SMAR M2QD offers the longer runtime (600 min vs 480 min).
- SMAR M2QD offers the lighter build (30 kg vs 80 kg).
TECHNISCHE DATEN IM VERGLEICH
| AspinaAMR85L | SMAR M2QD | |
|---|---|---|
| Hersteller | ASPINA (Shinano Kenshi) | Polaris3D |
| Kategorie | Industrial-Robot | Industrial-Robot |
| Preis: | Nicht angekündigt | Nicht angekündigt |
| Gewicht | 80 kg | 30 kg |
| Traglast | 85 kg | 80 kg |
| Geschwindigkeit | 3.6 km/h | 3.6 km/h |
| Akkulaufzeit | 480 min | 600 min |
| Konnektivität | Wi-Fi 2.4/5 GHz; USB-A; 6-ch I/O; PLC/API | — |
Kaufberater und Preise
HÄUFIG GESTELLTE FRAGEN
What is the difference between the AspinaAMR85L and the SMAR M2QD?
AspinaAMR85L is made by ASPINA (Shinano Kenshi), while SMAR M2QD is made by Polaris3D. Both are industrial-robots, so the differences come down to price and specifications.
Which has the higher payload, the AspinaAMR85L or the SMAR M2QD?
The AspinaAMR85L has the higher payload at 85 kg, compared to 80 kg for the SMAR M2QD.
Which has the longer battery life, the AspinaAMR85L or the SMAR M2QD?
The SMAR M2QD has the higher runtime at about 600 minutes, compared to about 480 minutes for the AspinaAMR85L.