AspinaAMR85L vs SMAR M2
ASPINA (Shinano Kenshi) vs Polaris3D — specs, price, and data-backed comparison.
KURZFAZIT
- AspinaAMR85L offers the higher payload (85 kg vs 80 kg).
- SMAR M2 offers the longer runtime (720 min vs 480 min).
- SMAR M2 offers the lighter build (50 kg vs 80 kg).
TECHNISCHE DATEN IM VERGLEICH
| AspinaAMR85L | SMAR M2 | |
|---|---|---|
| Hersteller | ASPINA (Shinano Kenshi) | Polaris3D |
| Kategorie | Industrial-Robot | Industrial-Robot |
| Preis: | Nicht angekündigt | Nicht angekündigt |
| Gewicht | 80 kg | 50 kg |
| Traglast | 85 kg | 80 kg |
| Geschwindigkeit | 3.6 km/h | — |
| Akkulaufzeit | 480 min | 720 min |
| Konnektivität | Wi-Fi 2.4/5 GHz; USB-A; 6-ch I/O; PLC/API | — |
Kaufberater und Preise
HÄUFIG GESTELLTE FRAGEN
What is the difference between the AspinaAMR85L and the SMAR M2?
AspinaAMR85L is made by ASPINA (Shinano Kenshi), while SMAR M2 is made by Polaris3D. Both are industrial-robots, so the differences come down to price and specifications.
Which has the higher payload, the AspinaAMR85L or the SMAR M2?
The AspinaAMR85L has the higher payload at 85 kg, compared to 80 kg for the SMAR M2.
Which has the longer battery life, the AspinaAMR85L or the SMAR M2?
The SMAR M2 has the higher runtime at about 720 minutes, compared to about 480 minutes for the AspinaAMR85L.