AspinaAMR300L vs MOBOT CubeRunner 2.5
ASPINA (Shinano Kenshi) vs WObit — specs, price, and data-backed comparison.
KURZFAZIT
- AspinaAMR300L offers the higher payload (300 kg vs 250 kg).
- AspinaAMR300L offers the faster top speed (3.6 km/h vs 2.99 km/h).
- AspinaAMR300L offers the longer runtime (570 min vs 480 min).
TECHNISCHE DATEN IM VERGLEICH
| AspinaAMR300L | MOBOT CubeRunner 2.5 | |
|---|---|---|
| Hersteller | ASPINA (Shinano Kenshi) | WObit |
| Kategorie | Industrial-Robot | Industrial-Robot |
| Preis: | Nicht angekündigt | Nicht angekündigt |
| Gewicht | 155 kg | — |
| Traglast | 300 kg | 250 kg |
| Geschwindigkeit | 3.6 km/h | 2.99 km/h |
| Akkulaufzeit | 570 min | 480 min |
| Konnektivität | Wi-Fi 2.4/5 GHz; USB-A; 8-ch I/O; PLC/API | 2.4 GHz Wi-Fi; MOBOT RoutePlanner |
Kaufberater und Preise
HÄUFIG GESTELLTE FRAGEN
What is the difference between the AspinaAMR300L and the MOBOT CubeRunner 2.5?
AspinaAMR300L is made by ASPINA (Shinano Kenshi), while MOBOT CubeRunner 2.5 is made by WObit. Both are industrial-robots, so the differences come down to price and specifications.
Which has the higher payload, the AspinaAMR300L or the MOBOT CubeRunner 2.5?
The AspinaAMR300L has the higher payload at 300 kg, compared to 250 kg for the MOBOT CubeRunner 2.5.
Which is faster, the AspinaAMR300L or the MOBOT CubeRunner 2.5?
The AspinaAMR300L has the higher top speed at 3.6 km/h, compared to 2.99 km/h for the MOBOT CubeRunner 2.5.
Which has the longer battery life, the AspinaAMR300L or the MOBOT CubeRunner 2.5?
The AspinaAMR300L has the higher runtime at about 570 minutes, compared to about 480 minutes for the MOBOT CubeRunner 2.5.