AspinaAMR300L vs EPALLET 2
ASPINA (Shinano Kenshi) vs Oppent — specs, price, and data-backed comparison.
KURZFAZIT
- EPALLET 2 offers the higher payload (500 kg vs 300 kg).
- EPALLET 2 offers the faster top speed (5.04 km/h vs 3.6 km/h).
- EPALLET 2 offers the longer runtime (600 min vs 570 min).
- AspinaAMR300L offers the lighter build (155 kg vs 313 kg).
TECHNISCHE DATEN IM VERGLEICH
| AspinaAMR300L | EPALLET 2 | |
|---|---|---|
| Hersteller | ASPINA (Shinano Kenshi) | Oppent |
| Kategorie | Industrial-Robot | Industrial-Robot |
| Preis: | Nicht angekündigt | Nicht angekündigt |
| Gewicht | 155 kg | 313 kg |
| Traglast | 300 kg | 500 kg |
| Geschwindigkeit | 3.6 km/h | 5.04 km/h |
| Akkulaufzeit | 570 min | 600 min |
| Konnektivität | Wi-Fi 2.4/5 GHz; USB-A; 8-ch I/O; PLC/API | Wi-Fi 802.11a/b/g/n (2.4/5 GHz) |
Kaufberater und Preise
HÄUFIG GESTELLTE FRAGEN
What is the difference between the AspinaAMR300L and the EPALLET 2?
AspinaAMR300L is made by ASPINA (Shinano Kenshi), while EPALLET 2 is made by Oppent. Both are industrial-robots, so the differences come down to price and specifications.
Which has the higher payload, the AspinaAMR300L or the EPALLET 2?
The EPALLET 2 has the higher payload at 500 kg, compared to 300 kg for the AspinaAMR300L.
Which is faster, the AspinaAMR300L or the EPALLET 2?
The EPALLET 2 has the higher top speed at 5.04 km/h, compared to 3.6 km/h for the AspinaAMR300L.
Which has the longer battery life, the AspinaAMR300L or the EPALLET 2?
The EPALLET 2 has the higher runtime at about 600 minutes, compared to about 570 minutes for the AspinaAMR300L.