AspinaAMR150L vs MOBOT CubeRunner 2.5
ASPINA (Shinano Kenshi) vs WObit — specs, price, and data-backed comparison.
KURZFAZIT
- MOBOT CubeRunner 2.5 offers the higher payload (250 kg vs 150 kg).
- AspinaAMR150L offers the faster top speed (3.6 km/h vs 2.99 km/h).
- MOBOT CubeRunner 2.5 offers the longer runtime (480 min vs 360 min).
TECHNISCHE DATEN IM VERGLEICH
| AspinaAMR150L | MOBOT CubeRunner 2.5 | |
|---|---|---|
| Hersteller | ASPINA (Shinano Kenshi) | WObit |
| Kategorie | Industrial-Robot | Industrial-Robot |
| Preis: | Nicht angekündigt | Nicht angekündigt |
| Veröffentlicht: | 2026 | — |
| Traglast | 150 kg | 250 kg |
| Geschwindigkeit | 3.6 km/h | 2.99 km/h |
| Akkulaufzeit | 360 min | 480 min |
| Konnektivität | — | 2.4 GHz Wi-Fi; MOBOT RoutePlanner |
Kaufberater und Preise
HÄUFIG GESTELLTE FRAGEN
What is the difference between the AspinaAMR150L and the MOBOT CubeRunner 2.5?
AspinaAMR150L is made by ASPINA (Shinano Kenshi), while MOBOT CubeRunner 2.5 is made by WObit. Both are industrial-robots, so the differences come down to price and specifications.
Which has the higher payload, the AspinaAMR150L or the MOBOT CubeRunner 2.5?
The MOBOT CubeRunner 2.5 has the higher payload at 250 kg, compared to 150 kg for the AspinaAMR150L.
Which is faster, the AspinaAMR150L or the MOBOT CubeRunner 2.5?
The AspinaAMR150L has the higher top speed at 3.6 km/h, compared to 2.99 km/h for the MOBOT CubeRunner 2.5.
Which has the longer battery life, the AspinaAMR150L or the MOBOT CubeRunner 2.5?
The MOBOT CubeRunner 2.5 has the higher runtime at about 480 minutes, compared to about 360 minutes for the AspinaAMR150L.