AspinaAMR100 vs SMAR M3-P
ASPINA (Shinano Kenshi) vs Polaris3D — specs, price, and data-backed comparison.
KURZFAZIT
- AspinaAMR100 offers the higher payload (100 kg vs 80 kg).
- AspinaAMR100 offers the longer runtime (480 min vs 360 min).
- AspinaAMR100 offers the lighter build (70 kg vs 800 kg).
TECHNISCHE DATEN IM VERGLEICH
| AspinaAMR100 | SMAR M3-P | |
|---|---|---|
| Hersteller | ASPINA (Shinano Kenshi) | Polaris3D |
| Kategorie | Industrial-Robot | Industrial-Robot |
| Preis: | Nicht angekündigt | Nicht angekündigt |
| Gewicht | 70 kg | 800 kg |
| Traglast | 100 kg | 80 kg |
| Geschwindigkeit | 3.6 km/h | 3.6 km/h |
| Akkulaufzeit | 480 min | 360 min |
| Konnektivität | Wi-Fi 2.4/5 GHz; USB-A; 6-ch I/O; PLC/API | — |
Kaufberater und Preise
HÄUFIG GESTELLTE FRAGEN
What is the difference between the AspinaAMR100 and the SMAR M3-P?
AspinaAMR100 is made by ASPINA (Shinano Kenshi), while SMAR M3-P is made by Polaris3D. Both are industrial-robots, so the differences come down to price and specifications.
Which has the higher payload, the AspinaAMR100 or the SMAR M3-P?
The AspinaAMR100 has the higher payload at 100 kg, compared to 80 kg for the SMAR M3-P.
Which has the longer battery life, the AspinaAMR100 or the SMAR M3-P?
The AspinaAMR100 has the higher runtime at about 480 minutes, compared to about 360 minutes for the SMAR M3-P.