AspinaAMR100 vs SMAR M2-C1H
ASPINA (Shinano Kenshi) vs Polaris3D — specs, price, and data-backed comparison.
KURZFAZIT
- SMAR M2-C1H offers the higher payload (110 kg vs 100 kg).
- SMAR M2-C1H offers the longer runtime (720 min vs 480 min).
- AspinaAMR100 offers the lighter build (70 kg vs 91 kg).
TECHNISCHE DATEN IM VERGLEICH
| AspinaAMR100 | SMAR M2-C1H | |
|---|---|---|
| Hersteller | ASPINA (Shinano Kenshi) | Polaris3D |
| Kategorie | Industrial-Robot | Industrial-Robot |
| Preis: | Nicht angekündigt | Nicht angekündigt |
| Gewicht | 70 kg | 91 kg |
| Traglast | 100 kg | 110 kg |
| Geschwindigkeit | 3.6 km/h | — |
| Akkulaufzeit | 480 min | 720 min |
| Konnektivität | Wi-Fi 2.4/5 GHz; USB-A; 6-ch I/O; PLC/API | — |
Kaufberater und Preise
HÄUFIG GESTELLTE FRAGEN
What is the difference between the AspinaAMR100 and the SMAR M2-C1H?
AspinaAMR100 is made by ASPINA (Shinano Kenshi), while SMAR M2-C1H is made by Polaris3D. Both are industrial-robots, so the differences come down to price and specifications.
Which has the higher payload, the AspinaAMR100 or the SMAR M2-C1H?
The SMAR M2-C1H has the higher payload at 110 kg, compared to 100 kg for the AspinaAMR100.
Which has the longer battery life, the AspinaAMR100 or the SMAR M2-C1H?
The SMAR M2-C1H has the higher runtime at about 720 minutes, compared to about 480 minutes for the AspinaAMR100.