Armeo® Spring vs Nao
Hocoma vs Aldebaran Robotics (SoftBank / United Robotics) — specs, price, and data-backed comparison.
Armeo® Spring
Hocoma
Nicht angekündigt
Nao
Aldebaran Robotics (SoftBank / United Robotics)
Nicht angekündigt
TECHNISCHE DATEN IM VERGLEICH
| Armeo® Spring | Nao | |
|---|---|---|
| Hersteller | Hocoma | Aldebaran Robotics (SoftBank / United Robotics) |
| Kategorie | Ground | Ground |
| Preis: | Nicht angekündigt | Nicht angekündigt |
| Gewicht | ~100–150 kg | 4.5 kg |
| Akkulaufzeit | — | ~1–2 hours |
| Ladezeit | — | ~2 hours |
| Konnektivität | Optional network logging | Wi-Fi, Ethernet |
| Software / KI | Therapy visualization and logging | NAOqi OS |
HÄUFIG GESTELLTE FRAGEN
What is the difference between the Armeo® Spring and the Nao?
Armeo® Spring is made by Hocoma, while Nao is made by Aldebaran Robotics (SoftBank / United Robotics). Both are grounds, so the differences come down to price and specifications.