CLINABO vs RcDC
Nippon Signal vs Amano — specs, price, and data-backed comparison.
快速總結
- CLINABO offers the longer runtime (180 min vs 120 min).
- RcDC offers the lighter build (30 kg vs 220 kg).
規格對比
| CLINABO | RcDC | |
|---|---|---|
| 公司 | Nippon Signal | Amano |
| 類別 | Cleaning-Robots | Cleaning-Robots |
| 價格： | 尚未公布 | 尚未公布 |
| 發布年份： | — | 2015 |
| 重量 | 220 kg | 30 kg |
| 速度 | — | 2.3 km/h |
| 續航時間 | 180 min | 120 min |
| 充電時間 | — | About 4 hours |
| 連線方式 | — | Wireless link to a tablet |
| 軟體 / AI | Automatic map and route generation | Tablet app for setting cleaning areas, editing obstacles and monitoring completed areas |
選購指南與價格
常見問題
What is the difference between the CLINABO and the RcDC?
CLINABO is made by Nippon Signal, while RcDC is made by Amano. Both are cleaning-robotss, so the differences come down to price and specifications.
Which has the longer battery life, the CLINABO or the RcDC?
The CLINABO has the higher runtime at about 180 minutes, compared to about 120 minutes for the RcDC.