KR 8 R1640-2 nano vs Unity Robotic Case Erector And Case Packer
KUKA vs Unity Robotics — specs, price, and data-backed comparison.
KR 8 R1640-2 nano
KUKA
Nicht angekündigt
Unity Robotic Case Erector And Case Packer
Unity Robotics
Nicht angekündigt
KURZFAZIT
- Unity Robotic Case Erector And Case Packer offers the higher payload (50 kg vs 8 kg).
- Unity Robotic Case Erector And Case Packer offers the longer reach (2 m vs 1.64 m).
- KR 8 R1640-2 nano offers the lighter build (158 kg vs 280 kg).
TECHNISCHE DATEN IM VERGLEICH
| KR 8 R1640-2 nano | Unity Robotic Case Erector And Case Packer | |
|---|---|---|
| Hersteller | KUKA | Unity Robotics |
| Kategorie | Industrial-Robot | Industrial-Robot |
| Preis: | Nicht angekündigt | Nicht angekündigt |
| Veröffentlicht: | 2018 | — |
| Gewicht | 158 kg | 280 kg |
| Traglast | 8 kg | 50 kg |
| Reichweite | 1.64 m | 2 m |
| Freiheitsgrade | 6 | 6 |
| Akkulaufzeit | — | 30 min |
HÄUFIG GESTELLTE FRAGEN
What is the difference between the KR 8 R1640-2 nano and the Unity Robotic Case Erector And Case Packer?
KR 8 R1640-2 nano is made by KUKA, while Unity Robotic Case Erector And Case Packer is made by Unity Robotics. Both are industrial-robots, so the differences come down to price and specifications.
Which has the higher payload, the KR 8 R1640-2 nano or the Unity Robotic Case Erector And Case Packer?
The Unity Robotic Case Erector And Case Packer has the higher payload at 50 kg, compared to 8 kg for the KR 8 R1640-2 nano.